评价比较光学流体分析手段的方法
In this report we present the methodology we are using in the AMI group tocompare optic flow estimation methods in the context of the FLUID SpecificTargeted Research Project - Contract No 513633 founded by the CEE. The maingoal of this report is to try to unify comparison criteria between the differentparnerts in order to share information and conclusions. We think that it is oneof the topics we have to address in Las Palmas Meeting December next. Inorder to describe the methodology we use, we divide it in five steps:1. We choose a number of optic flow estimation methods2. We choose an image sequence dataset to apply the methods.3. We apply the methods and we store the results in a ASCII file using anstandard format4. We define a number of statistics to compare the methods (we use theASCII files as basic information to compare).5. We compute the statistics for each pair of methods and we generate tableswith the information. To help result interpretation we use arrow imagesand in the case we know the optic flow groundtruth we generate image toprovide the information about what method perform better in the differentareas of the image.To illustrate this approach and to fit ideas we present the results of thisapproach in a particular image sequence provided by LaVision in sections from1.1 to 1.4. Then, in section 2 we remark some of the difficulties we have foundin our work, which should be discussed in order to be able to compare resultsprovided by all the partners of the FLUID project.