仪器信息网APP
选仪器、听讲座、看资讯
立即体验
APP内打开
回版面
1
收藏
点赞
拍砖
举报
取消
发布
当前位置:
仪器社区
>
休闲灌水区
>
快乐老家
>
帖子详情
【转帖】Scientist: Four golden lessons
malcolm
2007/01/07
私聊
快乐老家
Nature 426, 389 (27 November 2003); doi:10.1038/426389a
Scientist: Four golden lessons
STEVEN WEINBERG
Steven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics, the University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712, USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk given by the author at the Science Convocation at McGill University in June 2003.
When I received my undergraduate degree - about a hundred years ago - the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean, every part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How could I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done? Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or swim. To my surprise, I found that this works. I managed to get a quick PhD - though when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big thing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to.
Another lesson to be learned, to continue using my oceanographic metaphor, is that while you are swimming and not sinking you should aim for rough water. When I was teaching at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the late 1960s, a student told me that he wanted to go into general relativity rather than the area I was working on, elementary particle physics, because the principles of the former were well known, while the latter seemed like a mess to him. It struck me that he had just given a perfectly good reason for doing the opposite. Particle physics was an area where creative work could still be done. It really was a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the work of many theoretical and experimental physicists has been able to sort it out, and put everything (well, almost everything) together in a beautiful theory known as the standard model. My advice is to go for the messes - that’s where the action is.
My third piece of advice is probably the hardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for wasting time. Students are only asked to solve problems that their professors (unless unusually cruel) know to be solvable. In addition, it doesn’t matter if the problems are scientifically important - they have to be solved to pass the course. But in the real world, it’s very hard to know which problems are important, and you never know whether at a given moment in history a problem is solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth century, several leading physicists, including Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work out a theory of the electron. This was partly in order to understand why all attempts to detect effects of Earth’s motion through the ether had failed. We now know that they were working on the wrong problem. At that time, no one could have developed a successful theory of the electron, because quantum mechanics had not yet been discovered. It took the genius of Albert Einstein in 1905 to realize that the right problem on which to work was the effect of motion on measurements of space and time. This led him to the special theory of relativity. As you will never be sure which are the right problems to work on, most of the time that you spend in the laboratory or at your desk will be wasted. If you want to be creative, then you will have to get used to spending most of your time not being creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of scientific knowledge.
Finally, learn something about the history of science, or at a minimum the history of your own branch of science. The least important reason for this is that the history may actually be of some use to you in your own scientific work. For instance, now and then scientists are hampered by believing one of the over-simplified models of science that have been proposed by philosophers from Francis Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper. The best antidote to the philosophy of science is a knowledge of the history of science.
More importantly, the history of science can make your work seem more worthwhile to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not going to get rich. Your friends and relatives probably won’t understand what you’re doing. And if you work in a field like elementary particle physics, you won’t even have the satisfaction of doing something that is immediately useful. But you can get great satisfaction by recognizing that your work in science is a part of history.
Look back 100 years, to 1903. How important is it now who was Prime Minister of Great Britain in 1903, or President of the United States? What stands out as really important is that at McGill University, Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were working out the nature of radioactivity. This work (of course!) had practical applications, but much more important were its cultural implications. The understanding of radioactivity allowed physicists to explain how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be hot after millions of years. In this way, it removed the last scientific objection to what many geologists and paleontologists thought was the great age of the Earth and the Sun. After this, Christians and Jews either had to give up belief in the literal truth of the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual irrelevance. This was just one step in a sequence of steps from Galileo through Newton and Darwin to the present that, time after time, has weakened the hold of religious dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays is enough to show you that this work is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work, of which scientists are able to feel proud.
© 2003 Nature Publishing Group Privacy Policy
相关话题
1
孝顺的父母
2
孝顺的父母
3
关于使用数学模型对NCP(新冠肺炎)疫情进行评估的一些设想
4
新冠肺炎需要建立哪些专业实验室 !
5
气溶胶能传播新冠肺炎病毒吗?
+关注
私聊
happyjyl
第1楼
2007/01/07
茅茅已经发过了,也有网友翻译过了.
0
发表回复
近期热榜
赛默飞实验室产品焕新计划有奖调研!
【七月征文】不一YOUNG实验“猿”
报名开启:ICS2024第十三届光谱网络会议!
推荐收藏!盘点中药材及饮片检测解决方案
热门活动
甄选国优仪器,助推设备更新
采购咨询618活动:1000元奖励等你拿
猜你喜欢
最新推荐
热门推荐
更多推荐
【原创】10.1日前半天
2009/10/01
【转帖】让俄罗斯夺冠吧!
2008/06/25
小心,你家的盐可能是假的!3种方法,验出假盐
讨论
2017/06/06
【原创】[原创]即景
2008/08/18
【第16金】 王峰 / 秦凯 跳水 男子3米双人跳板决赛比分
2008/08/13
你知道β射线在线测厚仪是怎样工作的吗?
讨论
2016/04/09
【原创】关于坛歌的第二次讨论
2007/02/02
【家中淘宝】升值5000倍的钞票
原创
2012/01/04
这小雨不断
原创
2024/07/08
大连自然风景美
原创
2024/07/08
欣赏三甲子菜开花了
原创
2024/07/08
快乐永相伴
原创
2024/07/08
笑对生活
原创
2024/07/08
醒一醒搬砖继续
原创
2024/07/08
论坛朋友早上好
原创
2024/07/08
欣赏风景天树
原创
2024/07/08
检测报告一定要有判定结果吗?
求助
2024/07/01
气相FID重现性不好原因
求助
2024/07/01
求助安捷伦GC7890B,EPC无响应解决办法
求助
2024/07/01
‘有奖问答’对错题’:用抽样方案(30,0)对产品批进行连续验收,当批不合格品率为1%时,方案的接收概率为73.97%,则平均检出质量为( )。
讨论
2024/07/05
HJ1332便携非甲实际应用问题
讨论
2024/07/01
如何做好体系工作?
分享
2024/07/01
多人主检的报告,检测审核应该怎么签字
求助
2024/07/05
EI源的灯丝镉厂家通用吗?
求助
2024/07/03
【讨论】请大家推荐你认为比较好的帖子和用户
2007/01/07
【求助】(已应助)氢氧化钠标准溶液问题
2007/01/07
【求助】求高精度电子温度计的采购信息
2007/01/07
【求助】求高精度温度计的采购信息
2007/01/07
【原创】微波消解仪CEM-MARS 5操作规程XPRESS
2007/01/07
【长期置顶!】本版版规及新手如何赚取积分-发帖前必看
2007/01/07
【求助】请问NOE效应测定的具体操作和一般操作有很大差别吗?
2007/01/07
【分享】现代有机质谱概论
2007/01/07
品牌合作伙伴
岛津
日立科学仪器
珀金埃尔默仪器(上海)有限公司(PerkinElmer)
日本电子株式会社
丹纳赫
安捷伦
赛默飞世尔科技
普析通用
欧波同
天美
天瑞仪器
德国耶拿
海能技术
马尔文帕纳科
磐诺科技
上海仪电科仪
梅特勒托利多
聚光科技
莱伯泰科
盛瀚
多宁生物
丹东百特
科哲
卓立汉光
屹尧科技
华谱科仪
宝德仪器
优莱博
HORIBA
布鲁克核磁
举报帖子
执行举报
点赞用户
好友列表
加载中...
正在为您切换请稍后...