仪器信息网APP
选仪器、听讲座、看资讯

氢化物原子吸收在形态分析中的应用---砷形态分析

原子吸收光谱(AAS)

  • 提供1篇用HGAAS进行形态分析的文章;
    对于从事HGAAS As神态分析的应该是一篇比较好的文章,有很多经验和思路可以借鉴的

    METAL INTERFERENCES AND THEIR REMOVAL PRIOR TO THE DETERMINATION OF As(T) AND As(III) IN ACID
    MINE WATERS BY HYDRIDE GENERATION ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY

    By R. Blaine McCleskey, D. Kirk Nordstrom, and James W. Ball

    Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4117

    U.S. Department of the Interior
    U.S. Geological Survey

    Boulder, Colorado
    2003


    CONTENTS

    Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................2
    Introduction.................................................................................................................................................2
    Methods of investigation.............................................................................................................................3
    Sample collection and preservation.....................................................................................................3
    Reagents .............................................................................................................................................3
    Analytical apparatus ............................................................................................................................3
    Analytical procedures.........................................................................................................................3
    Determination of arsenic(T) .........................................................................................................4
    Determination of arsenic(III)........................................................................................................4
    Removal of interfering metals prior to arsenic(III) determination ...............................................4
    Results and discussion ................................................................................................................................5
    Selective reduction of arsenic(III).......................................................................................................5
    Potential metal interferences on the determination of arsenic(T) .......................................................5
    Potential metal interferences on the determination of arsenic(III)......................................................6
    Cation exchange separation of iron(III) and copper............................................................................8
    Accuracy and time stability of arsenic redox species in acid mine waters .........................................8
    Accuracy of arsenic(T) determinations ........................................................................................8
    Accuracy of arsenic(III) determinations.....................................................................................11
    Time stability of arsenic redox species.......................................................................................11
    Summary ...................................................................................................................................................12
    References cited ........................................................................................................................................12

    FIGURES

    1-13. Graphs showing

    1. Effect of NaBH4 concentration on the calibration curve in solutions containing only As(III)........5
    2. Effect of NaBH4 concentration on the reduction of As(V) to As(III) in solutions containing
    10 μg/L As(III) and varying As(V) concentrations .........................................................................5
    3. As(T) determinations in the presence of potential interfering metals..............................................6
    4. As(T) determinations in the presence of hydride-forming metals ...................................................6
    5. As(III) determinations in the presence of potential interfering metals ............................................7
    6. As(III) determinations in the presence of interfering metals ...........................................................7
    7. As(III) determinations in the presence of hydride-forming metals .................................................8
    8. Additive interference in the determination of As(III) in a solution containing 10 micrograms
    per liter As(III) and 5 milligrams per liter Cu(II) ............................................................................8
    9. Spike recovery determinations of As(T) using hydride generation atomic absorption
    spectrometry....................................................................................................................................9
    10. As(T) determinations by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry and
    hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry for 20 samples collected from
    Summitville Mine, Colo., 6 samples collected from Richmond Mine, Calif., and 3 samples
    collected from the Penn Mine, Calif. ...............................................................................................9
    11. Spike recovery determinations using hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry for
    As(III) in samples separated by cation exchange and not separated .............................................11
    12. As(III) determinations using hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry for samples
    collected from the Summitville Mine ............................................................................................11
    13. Time stability of As(III) for 45 surface and ground water samples from Yellowstone National
    Park, Wyo.; Questa Mine site, N. Mex.; Summitville Mine site, Colo.; Richmond Mine,
    Calif.; Penn Mine, Calif.; Ester Dome, Alaska; Fallon, Nev.; Mojave Desert, Calif.; and
    Kamchatka, Russia reanalyze 3 to 15 months after the initial determination. The curved line
    is a Gaussian Fit .............................................................................................................................12

    TABLES

    1. Cation exchange separation of Cu and Fe(III)..................................................................................9
    2. Composition of acid mine water samples collected from Summitville Mine, Colo.;
    Richmond Mine, Calif.; and Penn Mine, Calif. ............................................................................10
    3. As(T) determinations in U.S. Geological Survey standard reference water samples.....................10
  • 该帖子已被管理者-设置为精华,下面是奖励记录:
    +关注 私聊
  • 第1楼2005/04/12

    Explanation of abbreviations

    --- (not analyzed or not measured)
    °C (degrees Celsius)
    AAS (atomic absorption spectrometry)
    As(III) (arsenic(III) or arsenite)
    As(V) (arsenic(V) or arsenate)
    As(T) (total arsenic (As(III) plus As(V))
    cm (centimeter)
    conc. (concentration)
    EDL (electrodeless discharge lamp)
    FIAS (flow injection analysis system)
    g (gas)
    HCl (hydrochloric acid)
    HGAAS (hydride generation-atomic
    absorption spectrometry)
    HNO3 (nitric acid)
    KI (potassium iodide)
    ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma-optical
    emission spectrometry)
    ISE (ion-selective electrode)
    μg/L (micrograms per liter)
    M (moles per liter)
    meq/L (milliequivalents per liter)
    meq/mL (milliequivalents per milliliter)
    mg/L (milligrams per liter)
    min. (minute)
    mL (milliliters)
    mv (millivolt)
    MPV (most probable value)
    μL (microliter)
    μm (micrometer)
    μS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter at 25
    degrees Celsius)
    n (number of analyses)
    NaBH4 (sodium borohydride)
    nm (nanometer)
    RSD (relative standard deviation)
    s (standard deviation)
    SRWS (standard reference water sample)
    v/v (volume per volume)
    w/v (weight per volume)
    w/w (weight per weight)

0
    +关注 私聊
  • 第2楼2005/04/12

    ABSTRACT

    Hydride generation atomic absorption
    spectrometry (HGAAS) is a sensitive and
    selective method for the determination of total
    arsenic (arsenic(III) plus arsenic(V)) and
    arsenic(III); however, it is subject to metal
    interferences for acid mine waters. Sodium
    borohydride is used to produce arsine gas, but
    high metal concentrations can suppress arsine
    production.
    This report investigates interferences of
    sixteen metal species including aluminum,
    antimony(III), antimony(V), cadmium,
    chromium(III), chromium(IV), cobalt,
    copper(II), iron(III), iron(II), lead,
    manganese, nickel, selenium(IV),
    selenium(VI), and zinc ranging in
    concentration from 0 to 1,000 milligrams per
    liter and offers a method for removing
    interfering metal cations with cation exchange
    resin. The degree of interference for each
    metal without cation-exchange on the
    determination of total arsenic and arsenic(III)
    was evaluated by spiking synthetic samples
    containing arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) with
    the potential interfering metal. Total arsenic
    recoveries ranged from 92 to 102 percent for
    all metals tested except antimony(III) and
    antimony(V) which suppressed arsine
    formation when the antimony(III)/total
    arsenic molar ratio exceeded 4 or the
    antimony(V)/total arsenic molar ratio
    exceeded 2. Arsenic(III) recoveries for
    samples spiked with aluminum,
    chromium(III), cobalt, iron(II), lead,
    manganese, nickel, selenium(VI), and zinc
    ranged from 84 to 107 percent over the entire
    concentration range tested. Low arsenic(III)
    recoveries occurred when the molar ratios of
    metals to arsenic(III) were copper greater than
    120, iron(III) greater than 70, chromium(VI)
    greater than 2, cadmium greater than 800,
    antimony(III) greater than 3, antimony(V)
    greater than 12, or selenium(IV) greater than
    1. Low recoveries result when interfering
    metals compete for available sodium
    borohydride, causing incomplete arsine
    production, or when the interfering metal
    oxidizes arsenic(III).
    Separation of interfering metal cations
    using cation-exchange prior to hydridegeneration
    permits accurate arsenic(III)
    determinations in acid mine waters containing
    high concentrations of interfering metals.
    Stabilization of the arsenic redox species for
    as many as 15 months is demonstrated for
    samples that have been properly filtered and
    acidified with HCl in the field. The detection
    limits for the method described in this report
    are 0.1 micrograms per liter for total arsenic
    and 0.8 micrograms per liter for arsenic(III).

0
    +关注 私聊
  • 第3楼2005/04/12

    INTRODUCTION

    Accurate determination of the redox
    state of dissolved As is important for
    interpreting its toxicity and mobility in the
    environment. Dissolved As can form aqueous
    species in several oxidation states, but in
    natural waters occurs dominantly as the
    inorganic oxyanions As(III) and As(V).
    Several analytical methods use hydride
    generation to selectively measure As redox
    species, but high metal concentrations can
    interfere with the determination of As(T)
    (As(III) plus As(V)) and As(III) (Smith, 1975;
    Welz and Melcher, 1984; Welsch and others,
    1990; Creed and others 1996; Hageman and
    Welsch, 1996). Accurate determination of
    arsenic redox species in acid mine waters is
    challenging because of elevated metal
    concentrations frequently found in this type of
    water (Nordstrom and Alpers, 1999). Sixteen
    metal species including Al, Cd, Co, Cr(III),
    Cr(VI), Cu(II), Fe(II), Fe(III), Mn, Ni, Pb,
    Sb(III), Sb(V), Se(IV), Se(VI), and Zn were
    evaluated as possible interferents on the
    determination of As(T) and As(III). Because
    As(III) and As(V) exist as oxyanions in
    solution, interfering metal cations can be
    removed from solution using cation-exchange
    while maintaining the existing As(III) and
    As(T) concentrations. Pre-analysis separation
    of Fe(III) using cation-exchange resin for the
    determination of As redox species by ion
    chromatography in iron sulfate-sulfuric acid
    media has been successfully performed (Tan
    and Dutrizac, 1985). Cyanide also has been
    used as a complexing agent to eliminate
    interferences by metals in the determination
    of As using hydride-generation (Jamoussi and
    others, 1996). Interferences usually associated
    with atomic absorption analysis are negligible
    because arsine (AsH3(g)) is separated from
    the sample matrix.
    Results of accurate and precise
    analytical methods can be invalidated by
    deteriorated samples. Proper filtration and
    preservation are critical for maintaining the
    existing As(III)/As(T) ratio prior to analyses.
    Wing and others (1987) observed that
    filtration (0.1-μm or 0.45-μm), acidification
    with HCl, and storage in the dark at 4°C
    effectively preserved the As redox species for
    up to 8 months in ground waters collected
    near Fallon, Nev. Except for Fe(III) and
    hydrogen sulfide (H2S), laboratory studies
    demonstrate that rates of oxidation of As(III)
    and reduction of As(V) in aqueous solution
    with redox agents common to natural waters
    are slow (Cherry and others, 1979). Filtering
    the sample removes colloidal material and
    bacteria that can affect the dissolved
    As(III)/As(T) ratio (Gihring and others, 2001;
    Wilkie and Hering, 1998). Acidification
    prevents precipitation of Fe hydroxides that
    can coprecipitate or adsorb As (Gao and
    others, 1988; Wilkie and Hering, 1996).
    Excluding light inhibits potential
    photochemical reactions (Emett and Khoe,
    2001; Hug and others, 2001) and storing the
    samples at 4°C slows chemical reactions.

0
    +关注 私聊
  • 第4楼2005/04/12

    To address the need for more accurate
    determinations of As(T) and As(III) by
    hydride generation atomic absorption
    spectrometry (HGAAS), the U.S. Geological
    Survey (USGS) evaluated metal interferences
    and their removal in acid mine waters. This
    report (1) describes sample collection,
    preservation, and analytical procedures for the
    accurate determination of As(T) and As(III)
    using HGAAS; (2) identifies metals and the
    concentration at which each interferes in the
    determination of As(T) and As(III); (3)
    demonstrates that Cu(II) and Fe(III), both of
    which interfere in the determination of As(III)
    by HGAAS, can be removed from solutions
    using cation-exchange while maintaining
    existing As(III)/As(T) ratios; (4) applies the
    method to acid mine waters collected from the
    Summitville Mine, Colo.; Penn Mine, Calif.;
    and Richmond Mine, Calif.; and (5) presents
    As redox species time stability data for 45
    surface- and ground-water samples collected
    during 1999-2002 from Yellowstone National
    Park, Wyo.; Questa Mine site, N. Mex.;
    Summitville Mine site, Colo.; Richmond
    Mine, Calif.; Penn Mine, Calif.; Ester Dome,
    Alaska; Fallon, Nev.; Mojave Desert, Calif.;
    and Kamchatka, Russia.

0
    +关注 私聊
  • 第5楼2005/04/12

    METHODS OF INVESTIGATION


    Sample Collection and Preservation

    Water samples collected in the field were
    pumped from the source through a 0.1 μm
    tortuous-path filter, acidified to pH less than 2
    with hydrochloric acid (typically 2 mL 6-M
    HCl per 250 mL sample), and stored in acidwashed
    opaque bottles at 4°C (To and others,
    1999).

    Reagents

    All reagents were of purity at least equal
    to the reagent-grade standards of the
    American Chemical Society. Double-distilled
    water and re-distilled or trace metal grade
    acids were used in all preparations. The
    following reagents were used for the As(T)
    and As(III) HGAAS procedure: 10 percent
    (w/v) KI from Aldrich; 10 percent (w/v) LAscorbic
    Acid from Aldrich; NaOH from
    Fisher; NaBH4 from Fisher; trace metal grade
    HCl from Fisher, Assay w/w 35 to 38 percent;
    1,000 mg/L As(III) from High Purity
    Standards; 1,000 mg/L As(V) from High
    Purity Standards; and cation-exchange resin,
    AG 50W-X8, 20-50 mesh, H+ form from Bio-
    Rad.
    The following single-element standards
    (1 to 10,000 mg/L) were prepared for
    interference studies: CuSO4⋅5H2O was used to
    prepare Cu(II); FeSO4⋅7H2O was used to
    prepare Fe(II); Fe2(SO4)3 was used to prepare
    Fe(III); Zn(NO3)2⋅6H2O was used to prepare
    Zn(II); MnSO4⋅H2O was used to prepare
    Mn(II); Al(NO3)3⋅9H2O was used to prepare
    Al(III); Ni(SO4)⋅6H2O was used to prepare
    Ni(II); CrCl3⋅6H2O was used to prepare
    Cr(III); K2Cr2O7 was used to prepare Cr(VI);
    CoCl2⋅6H2O was used to prepare Co(II); Cd
    powder was used to prepare Cd(II); NaSeO4
    was used to prepare Se(VI); Sb2O3 was used
    to prepare Sb(III); SbCl5 was used to prepare
    Sb(V); and Pb metal was used to prepare Pb.
    The Se(IV) standard was prepared by adding
    an equal volume of concentrated HCl to a
    portion of Se(VI) standard and heating at
    90°C for 20 minutes.

0
    +关注 私聊
  • 第6楼2005/04/12

    Analytical Apparatus

    An atomic absorption spectrophotometer
    (Perkin-Elmer (PE) – AAnalyst 300) with an
    electrically heated quartz cell having a path
    length of 15-cm inline with a flow injection
    analysis system (FIAS; PE – FIAS 100), an
    autosampler (PE – AS90), and an arsenic
    electrodeless discharge lamp (EDL) attached
    to an EDL power supply (PE – EDL System
    2) were used. The following spectrometer
    parameters were used: EDL current: 380 mv;
    wavelength: 193.7 nm; slit: 0.7 nm. Peak
    height was used for data processing. The
    following FIAS parameters were used: carrier
    gas: Ar; cell temperature: 900°C; sample
    loop: 500 μL; carrier solution: 10 percent
    (v/v) HCl; reducing agent: 0.25 percent
    (As(T)) or 0.03 percent (As(III)) NaBH4 in
    0.05 percent NaOH; carrier solution flow rate:
    10 mL/min; reductant flow rate: 5 mL/min.
    Sodium borohydride was prepared daily and
    filtered through a 0.45 μm polyvinylidene
    fluoride filter membrane using a vacuum
    pump.

0
    +关注 私聊
  • 第7楼2005/04/12

    嗯,不错。
    现在国内做得也很好,不仅可以测定总量,三价,五价,而且有机砷也可以测定。

0
    +关注 私聊
  • 第8楼2005/04/12

    Analytical Procedures

    Hydride formation occurs when As(III)
    in an acidic solution reacts with NaBH4
    according to the following reaction:
    3NaBH4 + 4H3AsO3 →
    4AsH3(g) + 3H3BO3 + 3NaOH (1)
    For the determination of As(T), As(V) is prereduced
    to As(III) using KI and L-ascorbic
    acid.
    All water samples and standards were
    prepared in 25-mL volumetric flasks. The
    method detection limits of the HGAAS
    analytical procedure used at the USGS
    National Research Laboratory in Boulder,
    Colo., are 0.1 μg/L for As(T) and 0.8 μg/L for
    As(III).

    Determination of Arsenic(T)

    1. A solution containing 10 percent (w/v)
    KI and 10 percent (w/v) L-ascorbic
    acid was prepared.
    2. To each 25-mL volumetric flask, 5 mL
    concentrated HCl and 2.5 mL of the
    KI−L-ascorbic acid solution prepared
    from step 1 were added.
    3. The As(III) standard stock solution
    was used to prepare standards ranging
    in concentration from 0 to 10 μg/L As.
    4. To demonstrate completeness of
    reduction, synthetic samples
    containing varying As(III)/As(V)
    ratios were prepared.
    5. A volume of sample (up to 16.5 mL)
    that will yield 1 to 10 μg/L As(T)
    when diluted to volume was
    transferred to a 25-mL volumetric
    flask.
    6. Appropriate spike-recovery samples
    were prepared by adding both As(III)
    and As(V) to selected samples to
    demonstrate reduction of As(V) and
    AsH3(g) production.
    7. The HGAAS analyses were performed
    a minimum of 30 minutes after sample
    preparation.

0
    +关注 私聊
  • 第9楼2005/04/12

    Determination of Arsenic(III)

    1. Twenty-five mL of concentrated HCl
    was added to each 25-mL volumetric
    flask.
    2. As(III) standards ranging in
    concentration from 0 to 20 μg/L were
    prepared.
    3. To demonstrate that As(V) was not
    reduced, synthetic samples were
    prepared containing several
    As(III)/As(V) ratios.
    4. A volume of sample (up to 24.75 mL)
    that will yield 2 to 20 μg/L As(III)
    when diluted to volume was
    transferred to a 25-mL volumetric
    flask.
    5. Appropriate spike-recovery samples
    were prepared by adding both As(III)
    and As(V) to demonstrate that As(V)
    is not reduced and that adequate
    AsH3(g) production occurs.
    6. The HGAAS analysis was performed
    immediately.

    Removal of Interfering Metals Prior
    To Arsenic(III) Determination

    For samples having a Cu(II)/As(III)
    molar ratio greater than 120, Fe(III)/As(III)
    molar ratio greater than 70, Cd/As(III) molar
    ratio greater than 800, or for samples with low
    As(III) spike recoveries, the sample was
    mixed with cation-exchange resin (AG 50WX8,
    20-50 mesh, H+ form) to remove
    interfering metals prior to determination of
    As(III). The following procedure was used to
    remove interfering metals and regenerate the
    resin:
    1. Approximately 100 grams dry resin
    was transferred to a 250-mL
    polyethylene bottle. The resin was
    washed 2 times with 100 mL 2-M HCl
    followed by 5 washes with distilled
    water. The excess water was decanted.
    2. The resin was dried in an oven at
    100°C.
    3. To a 50-mL polyethylene bottle, 12.5
    grams dried resin and 25 mL sample
    were added. The mixture was
    periodically shaken for 30 minutes.
    4. The sample was separated from the
    resin by decanting it into an acidwashed
    15-mL polyethylene bottle.
    This sample was used to determine the
    As(III) concentration.

0
    +关注 私聊
  • 第10楼2005/04/12

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


    Selective Reduction of Arsenic(III)

    During the As(III) determination, As(V)
    can be reduced to AsH3(g) by the NaBH4
    reductant causing an overestimation of As(III)
    concentration. At a constant carrier
    concentration and FIAS flow rate, increasing
    the NaBH4 concentration increases the
    sensitivity of the As(III) determination (fig.
    1); however, when the NaBH4 concentration
    exceeds 0.0625 percent, As(V) is reduced,
    causing an overestimation of As(III)
    concentration (fig. 2). To ensure selective
    reduction of As(III), the NaBH4 concentration
    is maintained at 0.03 percent for the As(III)
    determination for analyses described in this
    report.
    Potential Metal Interferences on the

    Determination of Arsenic(T)

    Sixteen metal species including Al, Cd,
    Co, Cr(III), Cr(VI), Cu(II), Fe(III), Fe(II),
    Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb(III), Sb(V), Se(IV), Se(VI),
    and Zn were evaluated as possible interferents
    on the determination of As(T). The
    interference of each metal was evaluated by
    spiking synthetic samples containing 6 μg/L
    As(III) and 6 μg/L As(V) with 0.002 to 1,000
    mg/L of the potential interfering metal and
    then determining the As(T) concentration
    using the HGAAS procedure (without cation
    exchange treatment). Arsenic(T) recoveries
    ranged from 92 to 102 percent for individual
    solutions spiked with Al, Cd, Co, Cr(VI),
    Cr(III), Cu(II), Fe(II), Fe(III), Mn, Ni, or Zn
    (fig. 3). For solutions spiked with a
    combination of metals including Al, Cd, Co,
    Cr(III), Cr(VI), Cu(II), Fe(II), Fe(III), Mn, Ni,
    and Zn, each up to a concentration of 500
    mg/L, As(T) recoveries ranged from 97 to
    102 percent. Dissolved Cu(II) was reduced to
    Cu metal during the pre-reduction step. The
    precipitated metal is visible at Cu
    concentrations greater than 100 mg/L and the
    liquid phase was decanted and analyzed with
    little change in As(T) concentration.
    Antimony(III) and Sb(V) were the only
    hydride-forming species found to interfere
    with the formation of AsH3(g) (fig. 4).
    Antimony(III) and Sb(V) substantially
    suppressed AsH3(g) formation by reacting
    with the NaBH4 when the Sb(III)/As(T) molar
    ratio exceeded 4 or the Sb(V)/As(T) molar
    ratio exceeded 2. In most waters,
    concentrations of Sb(III) and Sb(V) are much
    lower than As(T) concentrations and are
    likely to be diluted (As(T) less than 10 μg/L)
    to a concentration that will not interfere with
    the As(T) determination. Alkali and alkaline
    earth elements do not interfere with the As(T)
    determination (Smith, 1975).

0
查看更多
猜你喜欢最新推荐热门推荐更多推荐
举报帖子

执行举报

点赞用户
好友列表
加载中...
正在为您切换请稍后...