何当奇
第1楼2009/06/15
Does refers to people who are not known by name, but are known to be a part of an action. Not all courts are allowed to process cases like this, and some that do are only allowed to process it in certain cases.
是不是指姓名未知的被告?
法律一点都不懂,找老半天也没看出来该怎么理解
闲鹤野云
第9楼2009/06/15
April 8, 2009
Berger v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. et al KY Western Coffman Personal Injury- Product Liability Diversity
Plaintiff: Ambra Berger; Defendant: Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America, Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd., Does 1 through 100, inclusive
March 27, 2009
Wright v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al CA Southern Sammartino Fair Labor Standards Act Federal Question
Plaintiff: Robert C Wright; Defendant: Freedom Mortgage Corporation, DOES 1 through 100 inclusive
好像是法院公告中关于诉讼的表达。某人原告状告雅马哈公司所有一干人等....
也有使用and others而不是does1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE的
萤光飞舞
第10楼2009/06/15
我的是关于一些产品的案例 被告是一些公司
类似的一段:
Brimer, in the interest of the general public in California, filed a complaint in the Superior Court for the City and county of San Francisco against Boelter(公司名)and Does 1 through 150, alleging violation of Health& Safety Code based on alleged exposures to one
or more of the listed Chemicals contained in Covered Producted sold by Boelter.